Search for: "Order (February 05, 2016)" Results 1 - 20 of 314
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2024, 8:39 am by centerforartlaw
Until 2016, different jurisdictions in the United States had different rules regarding art confiscated due to Nazi persecution. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
The case concerned a claim against the Chief Constable of Kent police, which alleged that he produced a witness statement containing inaccurate personal data during 2016 criminal proceedings against the claimant. [read post]
3 May 2024, 2:58 am by Paul Maharg
It was billed in the conference programme as the launch of the BILETA online teaching policy. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
. , Hearing Co-Chairs: Commissioner Aaron Friedberg and Commissioner Jonathan Stivers 9:30 AM – 9:40 AM: Co-Chairs' Opening Remarks  9:40 AM – 11:10 AM: Panel I: Energy, Investment, and Economic Interests Erica Downs, Senior Research Scholar, Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia SIPA [Testimony]Mohammed Soliman, Director of the Strategic Technologies and Cyber Security Program, Middle East Institute [Testimony]Karen Young, Senior Research Scholar, Center on Global… [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
 The overturning of the anonymity order is covered by the Press Gazette here. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 3:10 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
§ 1320d-5(a)(3), HIPAA authorizes OCR as the designated representative of the Secretary of HHS to impose CMPs against a covered entity for post-February 18, 2009 HIPAA Privacy or Security Rule violations. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:24 am by centerforartlaw
”[6] Further, based on Porter, a buyer has a duty to use due diligence when purchasing art, even more so if there are “red flags” that indicate something is wrong with the transaction.[7]Caveat emptor, buyer beware, is a strong concept in the American courts, especially since art purchasers are considered to be sophisticated buyers who should put care and consideration into making a large purchase such as fine art.[8] Essentially, it is the buyer’s responsibility to look into… [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:24 pm by centerforartlaw
”[6] Further, based on Porter, a buyer has a duty to use due diligence when purchasing art, even more so if there are “red flags” that indicate something is wrong with the transaction.[7]Caveat emptor, buyer beware, is a strong concept in the American courts, especially since art purchasers are considered to be sophisticated buyers who should put care and consideration into making a large purchase such as fine art.[8] Essentially, it is the buyer’s responsibility to look into… [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ex. 1).1 Respondent denied the charge.At a two-day trial, held via video-conference and concluded on February 23, 2023,petitioner relied on documentary evidence and testimony from two of its employees, Firearms Instructor Villafane and Investigator Hall. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ex. 1).1 Respondent denied the charge.At a two-day trial, held via video-conference and concluded on February 23, 2023,petitioner relied on documentary evidence and testimony from two of its employees, Firearms Instructor Villafane and Investigator Hall. [read post]
27 May 2023, 5:50 pm
Nor is there much room to argue about the multi-level sources of protection for these works through domestic and international legal orders. [read post]