Search for: "Order of Exclusion from U.S. Courthouse, in Re" Results 1 - 20 of 62
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am by Norman L. Eisen
The court’s order is consistent with New York and U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm by Josh Blackman
So let's not pretend that strategic thinking about venue selection is the exclusive province of one type of litigant or one end of the political spectrum. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
Sometimes, the government will decide to reinstate the removal order and simply deport the person without a hearing. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
Removal is intended to protect the exercise of legitimate federal authority by government agents from interference by individual states. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 8:28 am by Eric Goldman
There is an Initial Order, where the claimant pays the second part of the filing fee, this time $60. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The criticism from left House Speaker Kevin McCarthy on the defensive following his decision to grant Carlson exclusive access to 41,000 hours of video from Capitol Police security cameras that day. [read post]
The clearest data come from the courthouse, in the form of cases we can see, and it’s not pretty. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm by Anna Bower
As a first order of business, she wants to address a few preliminary issues to “make sure that we’re all on the same page. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm by Aaron L. Nielson
This week it decided another one: In re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
Indeed, in negotiating the agreement, the plaintiff dealt exclusively with George Frank, his office assistant, and the defendants’ realtor. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ted Cruz Finds Friendly High Court Audience in Campaign Finance Challenge Courthouse News Service – Kelsey Reichman | Published: 1/19/2022 Members of the U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 12:56 am by Florian Mueller
" Were this a U.S. case, I could download at least a public redacted version of the affidavit from PACER and see the context. [read post]