Search for: "Otter Tail Power Company"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2023, 10:42 am
Trinko, LLP, 540 U.S. 398, 407–09 (2004), see also Aspen Skiing, 472 U.S. at 601; Otter Tail Power Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 3:31 am
An excerpt: North Central Electric Cooperative appeals from a district court judgment affirming a Public Service Commission order dismissing North Central’s complaint against Otter Tail Power Company after the Commission decided it did not have regulatory authority over Otter Tail’s extension of electric service to a facility owned by the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians on tribal trust land within the Turtle Mountain Indian… [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:35 pm
Otter Tail Power Co., 615 F.3d 1008 (8th Cir. 2010); National Parks and Conservation Association Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 6:45 am
The bill also exempts power cooperatives and municipal utilities from complying with the standard, which means that only the four investor-owned power companies serving Minnesota must comply: Xcel Energy, Minnesota Power, Otter Tail Power Co., and Interstate Power & Light. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
Ralph Lauren – General Court rejects appeal by Glenton Espana, confirms partly successful opposition by Polo/Lauren Company(Class 46) Defeat before OHIM no laughing matter for Dave TV: UK Gold Services Ltd v Dave Soho Ltd (jiplp) Cigars: Cuba Cohiba v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 1:19 pm
Otter Tail Power Company operates the plant. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 9:27 pm
The IRS's decision to limit the availability of free services under the Free File program was part of its ongoing attempt to achieve the statutory goal of increased e-filing through cooperation with the private sector.Exception to Implied Immunity DoctrineThe implied immunity doctrine exception articulated by the Supreme Court in Otter Tail Power Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (The IP Factor), (IPBiz), (IP Spotlight), (IP Law360), (Innovationpartners), (IPBiz),US FTC files complaint against Cephalon alleging the company paid four generic drug manufacturers (Ranbaxy, Teva, Mylan and Barr) to delay entry as part of litigation settlements: (IP Law360), (IP Law360), (Spicy IP),GlobalGlobal - GeneralWhat is IP value all about? [read post]