Search for: "Outdoor Identities, LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2023, 3:32 am
Crivello, Opposition No. 91233211 [Opposition to registration of FOUR SEASONS OUTDOOR LIVING CO. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 4:40 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of SERGEANT for "Ammunition; Firearms; Holsters; Component parts for guns," in view of the identical mark registered for "All purpose sporting bags, backpacks [and] duffel bags, all for use in the fields of hunting, fishing, camping and outdoor gear. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 4:34 am
Knuckle Sandwich LLC, Cancellation No. 92075933 [Opposition to registration of  EL BURRO BURRACHO, on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the registered marks EL BURRO and EL BURRO TACOS & BEER & Design, all for restaurant services.] [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 10:00 am by James Kachmar
Johnson Enterprises, LLC, in which the parties were battling a trade dress infringement claim involving these large outdoor Connect 4-like games. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:20 am
" The Board found the marks to be identical in sound and meaning and nearly identical in appearance. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 6:51 am by Kevin Kaufman
A state that has long attracted outdoor enthusiasts and thrill seekers hopes to turn weekend warriors into new residents, enticed by the state’s natural wonders, its proximity to large employment hubs in other states, and—policymakers hope—by a low-rate income tax, or perhaps none at all. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Wolfgang Demino
A self-represented litigant, of course, wouldn't know that.In the meantime, an amicus curiae out of nowhere [identity redacted to protect protagonists in the no-good-deed-must-go-unpunished serial] had filed what purports to be a compliant brief in support of the Appellant, and had included in his TRAP 11 Statement  (Amicus Curiae Disclosure) a provision that the pro se appellant was free to adopt the amicus brief or any portion of it as his own if he wised to do so.Discover… [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am by Joy Waltemath
EEOC (Docket No. 18-107) asks the Court to determine the scope of Title VII’s prohibition against discrimination based on “sex”—particularly, whether the statute stands as a shield against employment discrimination based on gender identity and transgender status. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:31 pm
  With regard to Plaintiffs' argument that the Fourth Department has "held a nearly identical definition of `pollutant' to be per se ambiguous" (Dkt. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 3:36 am
The Board found the involved goods to be identical or closely related. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 8:42 am
It found the mark merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1), and likely to cause confusion with the registered mark THE BLOB for goods legally identical to applicant's goods. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:59 am by Lisa Patricio
Lavan found that the City’s ban was unconstitutional both on its face and as applied to forty-five specific permit applications filed by Lamar Central Outdoor, LLC. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:07 am
In the three nearly identical opinions, the three defendants were each ordered to pay statutory damages of $2,500 for infringing a copyrighted photograph. [read post]