Search for: "P S v. R S" Results 1 - 20 of 14,140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
 The Court rejected Sibio’s arguments on this point, finding that the conditions for a PI as per R. 211 RoP were met. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Enfin, la tenue d’un nouveau procès complet ne s’impose pas à la lumière de l’arrêt R. c. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm by Administrator
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: R. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:45 am by JR Chaves
A mi juicio, entiendo que el “interés general” de la colectividad se yuxtapone al interés particular de los beneficiarios inmediatos, pero no desaparece ¿O acaso pierden los vecinos o usuarios habituales del tramo de carretera, su interés legítimo para defender su derecho al servicio público en idóneas condiciones? [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 2:08 am by Etienne Farnoux
The second note on Fuites de pétrole et fuite du temps: le point de départ de la prescription en cas de faits dommageables plurilocalisés à effets continus (Oil leaks and the passage of time: the starting point of the limitation period for plurilocal facts with continuous effects) then focuses on the judgement of the UK Supreme Court of May 10th, 2023 in the Jalla v Shell ([2023] UKSC 16) case. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Giles Peaker
The review decision in part stated I refer to R v Oxford CC ex p Doyle (1997) concluding that a Child Arrangement Order does not mean the Children are reasonably expected to live with both parents. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
L’infraction dont l’appelant a été reconnu coupable est celle d’avoir omis, sans excuse raisonnable, de s’arrêter et de donner ses nom et adresse après que le véhicule qu’il conduisait eut été impliqué dans un accident avec un autre véhicule. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:10 am by Dylan Gibbs
He covered topics like judicial vacancies, the need for Jordan timelines, and disinformation circulated about the Court’s R v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am by Michael Oykhman
To determine whether an utterance constituted a criminal threat, the case of R v McCraw, 1991 CanLII 49 (SCC) indicated that this determination is a question of law the court further stated, at p.88, that the words: “Must be looked at in the context in which they were spoken or written, in light of the person to whom they were addressed and the circumstances in which they were uttered. [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:00 am by Rogier Bartels
In R v Gul, it noted “that insurgents in non-international armed conflicts do not enjoy combatant immunity” (para. 50). [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
Elles décriront le système de justice pénale internationale du point de vue fonctionnel, particulièrement à la Cour pénale internationale, de la perspective particulière des accusés. [read post]