Search for: "P. v. Floyd"
Results 1 - 20
of 133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 8:18 am
Italian Sons & Daughters of America v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Amidst growing public scrutiny and socio-economic shifts, particularly following the 2020 George Floyd social justice movement, the topic of board diversity is at the forefront of corporate governance debates. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm
Slip Op. p. 52. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 12:13 pm
And Napear v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Many workplaces instituted diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) practices following the murder of George Floyd in 2020. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Monday's Fourth Circuit opinions from Judges Robert King, Marvin Quattlebaum, and Henry Floyd (Smith v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 5:48 am
"] From yesterday's Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision in Gierl v. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 7:02 pm
² The latest example is Calcano v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 8:58 am
From Martinez v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm
” (…) Glaser Weil’s argument focused on MDQ, LLC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
Encarnación, 330 P.3d 168 (Wash. 2014) ("Encarnación and Farías argued that even though the unlawful detainer action was meritless, they could not obtain sufficient rental housing after prospective landlords learned that they had an unlawful detainer action filed against them. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
The Application was refused, with Lord Summers relying on R v Legal Aid Board ex p. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 6:52 pm
V. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 9:13 am
" Lowery v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
