Search for: "P. v. Hard"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm
The Supreme Court today took the narrowest and simplest route to upholding an obscure tax provision in Moore v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 5:01 am
(Parisi v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 4:21 pm
Kuciemba v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 11:11 am
Jeffrey P. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:25 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
Circuit’s decision in Blassingame v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 12:08 pm
Hishon v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:01 pm
Nicholas P. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am
I try to emphasize throughout the book “how hard it is to engineer constitutional doctrine so that it will block the most objectionable parts of punitive prohibitionism, on the one hand, while avoiding judicial overreach and preserving worthy regulatory goals, on the other” (p. 16). [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
Second, Justice Kagan leaned hard into Federalist 37 and liquidation. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
.), hopes were high that some of these advantages would be preserved in the subsequent negotiations on the future relationship after Brexit.[9] A period of uncertainty in forum planning for cross-border transactions followed, as it required several rounds of negotiations between EU Chief Negotiator Michel Barnier and his changing UK counterparts (David Frost served for the final stage from 2019-2020) to discuss both the Withdrawal Agreement[10] as well as the consecutive Trade and Cooperation… [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:55 am
In Tuskia v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
” [p. 15]. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am
Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:28 pm
Both the company and claimant were resident in Singapore and thus gateway (p) was satisfied. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 8:07 am
The rules came in response to a Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Rosenstengel, who was willing to do the hard work required under Rule 702, specially as it has been recently amended for clarification and emphasis of the gatekeeper’s responsibilities to evaluate validity issues in the proffered opinions of expert witnesses. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:12 am
In Alden v. [read post]
