Search for: "P. v. Pettie" Results 1 - 20 of 104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
[As longtime LHB readers know, I post here the essays I research and write for my exam in American Legal History, which principally treats the years 1898 to 1962. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
Petty could show falsehood in the portrayal of being pro-choice and supporting Roe v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 12:00 am by Jason Kelley
EFF is deeply grateful for the support of the Alfred P. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
Saying "The indictment said that P stole money from petty cash" or "The civil complaint said that P stole money from petty cash" isn't libelous, even if P didn't steal the money, so long as the summary of the legal documents is full, fair, and accurate.[17] But saying "The indictment said that P stole money from petty cash," but omitting P's acquittal, is no longer a "full and… [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
But saying "The indictment said that P stole money from petty cash," but omitting P's acquittal, is no longer a "full and fair" report, precisely because it omits an important fact. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:21 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Pettie the applied the Anns/Kamloops test in 1995, indicating that a general commercial host duty exists to third-parties who are users of the road. [read post]