Search for: "P. v. Potter"
Results 1 - 20
of 153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Good afternoon. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Harry Potter Lexicon: “Perhaps b/c [D] is such a Harry Potter enthusiast, the Lexicon often lacks restraint in using Rowling’s original expression” Salinger v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
In Chewy v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Lovitch, Samantha P. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Funk v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 8:35 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Kosteckyj v Paramount Resources Ltd, 2022 ABCA 230 (CanLII) [75] There is no dispute that the governing test for constructive dismissal was established in Farber v Royal Trust Co, 1997 CanLII 387 (SCC), [1997] 1 SCR 846 [Farber], and solidified in Potter v New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission, 2015 SCC 10 [Potter]. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 7:02 pm
² The latest example is Calcano v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 6:52 am
Whitaker v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:01 am
Quand la Loi britannique de 2004 sur le partenariat civil (Civil Partnership Act 2004) est entrée en vigueur le 5 décembre 2005, son objectif était de permettre aux couples de même sexe d’obtenir la reconnaissance légale de leur relation en créant « une institution égalisante et parallèle » (traduction) du partenariat civil. 14 ans plus tard, l’exigence selon laquelle le mariage doit être contracté… [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
Data is not available for 2020 and 2021. [11] Section 218 of the Act. [12] Wilkinson v Kitzinger (No 2) [2007] 1 FLR 295, per Sir Mark Potter P at [50]. [13] See paragraph 21(2)(d) of Schedule 5; paragraph 5(2)(d) of Schedule 6; and paragraph 10(3)(a) of Schedule 7. [14] GW v RW (Financial Provision: Departure from Equality) [2003] 2 FLR 108; IX v IY [2018] EWHC 3053 per Williams J at [68]; MB v EB [2019] EWHC 1649. [15] Levin, I. (2004). [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 11:59 am
Those of us who were educated during the Bronze Age and earlier know Shepard’s as a set of ponderous, maroon-bound volumes that were last seen as set pieces for Harry Potter. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
” (p. 7). [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:12 am
Como dijo Potter Stewart sobre el porno, I know it when I see it, y la Corte, unánimemente, la vio. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Paris v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Potter Stewart Associate Justices, U.S. [read post]
31 May 2020, 7:06 pm
In Potter v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 6:02 am
In Google v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:36 pm
Sir Mark Potter (P) observed: [54]Nor does it mean that, in the course of Children Act proceedings conducted within the High Court, the judge may not, in the welfare interest of the child and in order to protect his or her privacy under Art 8, make an injunction or order which prohibits the identification of the child not simply to the extent set out in s 97(2) of the 1989 Act, but for a period beyond the end of the proceedings (eg until the age of 18). [read post]
