Search for: "P. v. Singh"
Results 1 - 20
of 187
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 5:38 pm
R. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
One of the hallmarks of PCCE is that it brings together academics, regulators, and industry professionals, and allows us to have candid conversations about corporate misconduct and the ways in which we can all work together to improve compliance. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm
John P. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: Singh et. al. v Braich, 2023 ONSC 5053 [1] This motion is about an examination for discovery gone wrong. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Similarly, in Karnail Singh and others v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 12:01 am
Harmindar Singh v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
P. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] Jed Rubenfeld and William P. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:21 pm
Specifically, Anastasiia focused on the impact of World War I on the history of camembert, a French cheese.Anna Maria Stein discussed relevant considerations for brand owners filing trade mark applications for environmentally friendly or sustainable goods and services.PatentsHenry P Yang reported on the appellate judgment in Intex v Ericsson 2023:DHC:2243-DB issued by the Delhi High Court. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
Warby LJ, with whom Sharp P and Singh LJ agreed, held that Steyn J had been correct in principle to reconsider the issue of serious harm in relation to the period after Ms Cadwalladr’s public interest defence fell away. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
On 22 February 2023 there was a hearing in the case of VLM v LPB (KB-2023-000117). [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
Canada On 15 February 2023, judgment was handed down in McDonald v Goranko, 2023 BCSC 231 (CanLII). [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
On 7 February 2023, the Court of Appeal (Sharp P, Singh and Warby LJJ) heard an appeal in the case of Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Krauss, New Light on the History of Free Exercise Exemptions: The Debates in Two Eighteenth-Century State Legislatures, (Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, 2022).Luke Boso, Religious Liberty, Discriminatory Intent, and the Status Quo Constitution, (Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper , Jan. 2023).Enrico Bonadio, Krishna Ravi Srinivas, Balaji Parthasarathy Iyengar & Atreya Choudhary, Gandhian Philosophy and Indian Intellectual Property, (in Relevance of Duties in… [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am
While the decision of Morgan v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm
Singh. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
A v Cornwall Council [2017] EWHC 842 (QB). [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:12 am
Lucas & Sons Ltd v Dorking and Horley Rural District Council (1966) 17 P & CR 111 did not apply. [read post]
