Search for: "P. v. Sup. Ct. (Cooper)"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 4:03 am
The Wright Loan and Mortgage has been in default since April 2011 (id., ¶ 148), and the mortgageecommenced a mortgage foreclosure action against Wright, Green and others captioned Deustche Bank National Trust Company v Green, et al., Sup Ct, NY County, index No. 850088/2017 (the Foreclosure Action) (id., ¶ 107; NYSCEF Doc No. 94, Bruno affirmation, exhibit C). [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
Smith v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Dist. of the City of New York, 2022 WL 797971 [Sup Ct, New York County 2022, Kotler, J.]; Matter of Bryan v The Bd. of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Dist. of the City of New York, 2022 WL 797971 [Sup Ct, New York County 2022, Kotler, J.]; Matter of Bryan v The Bd. of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 11:06 am
Ct. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
"[17] [V.] [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:21 pm
The Court in Stewart v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
The Court found that Regulation 3 does not carry the force of law (see Weiss v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:54 pm
" ACLU of RI cooperating attorney Labinger stated: "The internet can be full of intemperate and uncomfortable discussions. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Whitaker, Acting Attorney General of the United States, Washington, DC (Richard P. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Ct. [read post]
15 May 2018, 1:31 pm
Melevsky v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Selim v NYC Transit Authority, 220 AD2d 515]Terminating an employee for failing to turn in his keys when ordered. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 7:57 pm
Miller, NYLJ, 6/15/2005, p 19, col 1, Sup. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Since Daimler AG v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:53 am
(s10(4)) The listed “malware” and “spyware” functions include any of the following functions that the person who seeks express consent knows and intends will cause the computer system to operate in a manner that is contrary to the reasonable expectations of the owner or an authorized user of the computer system: (a) collecting personal information stored on the computer system; (b) interfering with the owner’s or an authorized user’s control of the computer… [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
