Search for: "PATERNITY OF W L" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
 August 2, 2023Appellate Division, First DepartmentAge 29 Law allows unmarried children through age 29, regardless of financial dependence, to be covered under a parent’s group health insurance policy  In B.D. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Many were in favor of owners: Petrella, Nat’l Cable TV Ass’n v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The record supported Supreme Court’s determination that the husband’s actual income in 2016 was $49,000, notwithstanding the fact that his 2016 W–2 form reported income of approximately $91,000. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 05523 (2d Dept., 2019) the parties were married in July 2006 and had two minor children, Liya L. and Emery L. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 10:07 am by Kate Fort
Accord In re Emoni W., 48 A.3d at 11 (an agency can investigate an out-of-state parent without an ICPC). [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:13 pm
New York: Monthly Review Press, 2nd ed., 2000.Van Ness, Daniel W. and Karen Heetderks Strong. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
A biological father is a legal parent if he is married to the child’s mother at the time of conception or birth, or if some other criterion for fatherhood is met such as an adjudication of paternity. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Dinwoodie: w/o empirical tools, you either end up w/judge as your empirical proxy or judge as normative decider. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:00 pm by Jan von Hein
Paternity of one intended parent With regard to the legal parenthood status of appellant no. 1, the Court pointed out that no violation of public policy could be found because the application of German law would produce the same result as the decision of the Superior Court of the State of California: Due to the fact that the surrogate mother was not married at the time of the child’s birth and appellant no. 1 had acknowledged paternity with her prior consent, German… [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 9:53 am by a.burchfield@csuohio.edu
Constitutional Law—From Goblins to Graveyards: The Problem of Paternalism in Compelled Perception, 35 W. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 6:10 am by Staci Zaretsky
[Daily Report] * Wherein a firm fails to Latham an ex-employee’s baby mama drama: a legal secretary who was allegedly told her pregnancy complications “were not [the director of HR's] problem” will see her case against L&W move forward. [read post]