Search for: "PATTERSON JR v STATE DEPT OF"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Morgan v Kerik, 267 AD2d 8, 9 [1st Dept 1995]; Simpson v Abate, 213 AD2d 190, 191 [1st Dept 1994]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Morgan v Kerik, 267 AD2d 8, 9 [1st Dept 1995]; Simpson v Abate, 213 AD2d 190, 191 [1st Dept 1994]). [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
"4 The Court explained that “It is well established that "an arbitrator has broad discretion to determine a dispute and fix a remedy and that any contractual limitation on that discretion must be contained, either explicitly or incorporated by reference, in the arbitration clause itself'," citing Matter of State of New York [Dept. of Correctional Servs. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 8:45 am
Patterson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am
In Patterson v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]