Search for: "PEOPLE v. SAMPLE"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,940
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am
” It may be “stored” even if the accused places them temporarily out of sight with the intention of retrieving them later… To meet the third criterion (the accused acted “in a careless manner or without reasonable precautions for the safety of other persons”), the Crown must show that the accused acted in a way which caused a risk to people or property (see: R v Batty, 2014 ONCA 620 (CanLII)). [read post]
24 May 2024, 9:35 am
In the case of Birchfield v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
It was devastating and it was only a small sample of the footage. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:47 am
Pa.) in Monge v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 9:06 pm
DeSantis said his state was pushing back against the global elite who want to force people to “eat bugs. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:57 pm
Boundaoui v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
See James v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
See James v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 3:23 pm
But here are some sample quotes, just to give a sense:"Vanderpool indisputably advised defendants to stonewall Masimo’s discovery efforts not once but twice, the second time after promising to provide substantive answers. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:49 am
People v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:11 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 2:24 pm
Paxton and Moody v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 9:48 am
For example, in People v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:01 am
Although this is not how the Law Society framed its arguments, it seems to me that public outcry in matters like AA, Melnick, and Colangelo is at its core premised in the belief that people who committed certain offences should simply never be granted the privilege of a law licence. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
See James v. [read post]
