Search for: "POINTS v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 62,481
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Giles Peaker
The review decision in part stated I refer to R v Oxford CC ex p Doyle (1997) concluding that a Child Arrangement Order does not mean the Children are reasonably expected to live with both parents. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
 An example of this use of the bad man thought experiment is provided in Justice Souter's opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
From the fathers’ rights lobby’s point of view this was all a very damp squib and did not advance their cause one iota, because it just said what had already been happening. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:29 am by Ronald Mann
We can only wait for the decision later this month in Harrington v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm by John Elwood
The shareholders alleged that those statements were false because they framed the risk as hypothetical, but Cambridge Analytica had already misused data at that point. [read post]
This decision was brought to the Court as a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Carl v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 10:40 am by Dylan Gibbs
And he wrote an excellent concurrence (page 25) explaining why:COPYRIGHTPaywall schmaywallBlacklock's Reporter v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am by Michael Oykhman
Generally, defences to voyeurism include showing a lack of mens rea or actus reus (meaning the mental and physical elements of the offence are not made out) and Charter arguments which point to a specific part of the investigation where your constitutional rights (such as your right to be free from unlawful search and seizure) may have been violated. [read post]
Instead, most states authorize the attorney general of the state to oversee and enforce charitable trusts. [read post]