Search for: "POWERS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY"
Results 1 - 20
of 406
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm
” This is a major decision, and will have implications for free speech online, as the Court must soon consider similar facts in the social-media context in Murthy v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
Internet and Social Media The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has concluded its investigation into Snap, Inc’s launch of the ‘My AI’ chatbot. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
In July 2023, the Information Commission ruled that the government should reveal available data on decision-making in relation to social care funding in a challenge brought by Access Social Care (ASC). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
-NAP is at its most powerful and potentially useful not as a direct manifestation of state power through law, but by embracing methods of regulatory governance that enhance the use of market levers to manage preferred behaviors. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 11:29 am
• ParticipantsThe following may send representatives, without the right to vote and at the charge of their corresponding administrative budgets:- Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe;- Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe;- European Court of Human Rights;- Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe;- Conference of INGOs of the Council of Europe;- Eurimages;- European Audiovisual Observatory;- Committees or other bodies of the… [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
United States The House of Representatives have passed the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a bill which has been characterised as having the power to ban TikTok. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
The Commission is a securities regulator without statutory authority or expertise to address political and social issues. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
The Privacy and Information Security Law Blog has more information here. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
NetChoice v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
v=BxL9DRdk6Xc New Animation: End Hare Coursing In a world where compassion and empathy should be our guiding principles, it is disheartening to discover that some individuals derive enjoyment and profit from the suffering of innocent creatures. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm
By contrast, a “newspaper, no matter how secure its local monopoly, does not possess the power to obstruct readers’ access to other competing publications” and cannot “prevent other newspapers from being distributed to willing recipients in the same locale. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
There is market power here. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
Read the Commissioner’s original response here and his updated response here. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
Roberts v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
ATTORNEY’S FEES ■Jose Parra, Applicant v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
” Kansas v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 12:37 pm
This would not be a good remedy, for instance, in high-volume adjudication systems involving quintessential public rights—like veterans and social security benefits, Medicare reimbursement claims, and immigration. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 12:29 pm
In this first-of-its-kind JURIST “global dispatch” on a single topic, 15 law students and young lawyers from around the world, all of them JURIST correspondents from outside of Israel and Palestine, join together to offer a panoramic view of how the current Gaza conflict is unfolding in their countries and regions. [read post]
