Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,532
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
Neither of these two cases is controlling in the Trump case, although there are two others pending on the use of obstruction (Fischer v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:58 pm
Following the decision in Huff v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 11:31 am
" (See the recent post on Adams v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 2:00 am
Scott & White Hospital v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, some of the leading scholars who first advocated textualism did so precisely because they thought that purposivism was frequently used as a license for judicial creativity.They were not entirely wrong. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm
In this respect, the DSC’s decision shows a degree of remarkable confusion in the using the appropriate legal terminology and understanding fundamental legal concepts. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:38 pm
" Tornetta v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 7:48 am
Yesterday, the First Circuit issued its decision in L.M. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am
PA’s studies are widely used because others use and seemingly take heed o [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
The strength of any defence rests on the evidence against you and the precise details of the allegations. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 5:51 am
The Tribunal held that the obligation is one of “due diligence” and the standard “is stringent, given the high risks of serious and irreversible harm to the marine environment” from greenhouse gas emissions (para. 243). [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
” In Strickland v. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court in 1975 in Taylor v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:27 pm
See, Gideon v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:38 am
LKQ had presented the following comparisons between the D’625 patent, Lian, and Tucson: The Federal Circuit aims to reset the obviousness standard to the one set forth Graham v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:05 am
For instance, in 2018, the Supreme Court held in Carpenter v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 5:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:45 am
LKQ Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am
The precise timeline for Pre-Trial Chamber review remains uncertain. [read post]
