Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 1 - 20 of 4,526
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
PA’s studies are widely used because others use and seemingly take heed o [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Michael Oykhman
The strength of any defence rests on the evidence against you and the precise details of the allegations. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 5:51 am by Melissa Stewart
The Tribunal held that the obligation is one of “due diligence” and the standard “is stringent, given the high risks of serious and irreversible harm to the marine environment” from greenhouse gas emissions (para. 243). [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:38 am by Gregory Lars Gunnerson
LKQ had presented the following comparisons between the D’625 patent, Lian, and Tucson: The Federal Circuit aims to reset the obviousness standard to the one set forth Graham v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
  But that is precisely what we have witnessed on campuses across the country (e.g., University of Michigan and NYU). [read post]
15 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Firm leadership may openly discuss among its personnel what went wrong; use the underlying violations as an opportunity to teach and instill in all staff the critical importance of professional integrity, ethics, and serving the public trust; and possibly internally sanction, terminate, or suspend the audit partner. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
These include the development of “softlaw”, but also the increasingly present dimension of guidance and planning: environ-mental law, which is obviously of particular interest to us here abounds in programmes,schemes, plans, etc.In short, we must be open to accept that potentially, all forms of legal normativitycould be mobilised to mitigate climate change.II. [read post]
9 May 2024, 3:59 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Even so, the Supreme Court has required that Congress provide a "sufficiently definite and precise" standard that can "enable Congress, the courts and the public to ascertain whether the [Executive official] . . . has conformed to those standards. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:42 am by Richard Hunt
WCAG 2.1 AA allows alternate conforming versions precisely because the best technical minds in the world think it can be done. [read post]