Search for: "PRICE v. HOUSE OF RUTH"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2023, 7:30 am
He’s best known for Brown v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 7:14 am
And of course, all three Trump-appointed justices joined the Court’s other conservatives to overturn Roe v. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 11:34 pm
" NFIB v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 7:00 am
Effingham County Court House. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:05 am
The pic is the closest I’ll ever get to seeing that inscription, but it could be yours for the right price. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm
He represented plaintiffs in important lawsuits involving claims of racial or gender bias by employers, including Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm
In practice, courts have not been well disposed to Title III plaintiffs, as scholars such as Ruth Colker and Samuel Bagenstos have demonstrated. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:26 am
In California v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 1:27 pm
” In NFIB v. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
In 2015, five justices on the Supreme Court (including Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Anthony Kennedy, who have been replaced by hard-right conservative ideologues) issued the Obergefell decision recognizing the constitutional right to same-sex marriage. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
Hyatt ; Janus v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
It is because, for reasons left almost completely unexplained, he believes that voters for, say, the House of Representatives, the one branch of the national government in which “the people” will play any role at all, will vote for enlightened elites who will use their powers not to pursue the interests of their selfish constituents, but rather to achieve the “public good. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 3:11 pm
There is a price for unanimity. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:00 am
(In a petition for certiorari this past term, Price v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
Maryland’s Senate Bill 2 (and the cross-filed House Bill 965) is concerning in its own right, but also as a harbinger of action in other states. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
The MA v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 12:43 am
Topics will include, amongst others: the implications of non-obviousness for follow-on medical innovation (e.g. drug repurposing) after the UK Supreme Court's 2019 decision in Actavis v ICOS; the current and future roles of competition law in controlling drug prices, including an update on Flynn and Pfizer; and the potential effect of Brexit on the trade of medical products. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
On January 15, the court issued its first 5-4 decision of the term, in Stokeling v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 3:50 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg later granted a temporary administrative stay and set a December 11 deadline for the House to respond to Trump’s request. [read post]
