Search for: "PRICE v. HOUSE OF RUTH" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2022, 7:14 am by JURIST Staff
And of course, all three Trump-appointed justices joined the Court’s other conservatives to overturn Roe v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:05 am by Liz Dunshee
The pic is the closest I’ll ever get to seeing that inscription, but it could be yours for the right price. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm by James Romoser
He represented plaintiffs in important lawsuits involving claims of racial or gender bias by employers, including Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Harris
In practice, courts have not been well disposed to Title III plaintiffs, as scholars such as Ruth Colker and Samuel Bagenstos have demonstrated. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In 2015, five justices on the Supreme Court (including Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Anthony Kennedy, who have been replaced by hard-right conservative ideologues) issued the Obergefell decision recognizing the constitutional right to same-sex marriage. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  It is because, for reasons left almost completely unexplained, he believes that voters for, say, the House of Representatives, the one branch of the national government in which “the people” will play any role at all, will vote for enlightened elites who will use their powers not to pursue the interests of their selfish constituents, but rather to achieve the “public good. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:00 am by Ronald Collins and David Hudson
(In a petition for certiorari this past term, Price v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am by Kevin Kaufman
Maryland’s Senate Bill 2 (and the cross-filed House Bill 965) is concerning in its own right, but also as a harbinger of action in other states. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 12:43 am
Topics will include, amongst others: the implications of non-obviousness for follow-on medical innovation (e.g. drug repurposing) after the UK Supreme Court's 2019 decision in Actavis v ICOS; the current and future roles of competition law in controlling drug prices, including an update on Flynn and Pfizer; and the potential effect of Brexit on the trade of medical products. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am by Amy Howe
On January 15, the court issued its first 5-4 decision of the term, in Stokeling v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg later granted a temporary administrative stay and set a December 11 deadline for the House to respond to Trump’s request. [read post]