Search for: "Page v. Microsoft Corporation et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
From its controversial collaborations to its legal skirmishes with corporate giants, MSCHF’s journey exemplifies the complexities and contradictions inherent in the intersection of art and copyright law. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Several leading companies including IKEA Supply, Microsoft, and Salesforce support the reform, and a number of smaller firms do as well.[5] For the reasons discussed below, more firms – and their legal and other advisers– should follow them. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 1:01 pm
Microsoft asks the court to adjudge its motion to dismiss regardless of any commitments not to close the deal before a given date.Here's Microsoft's motion, filed late Tuesday afternoon Pacific Time:De Martini et al. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 2:20 am
First, the document:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
According to this Wikipedia entry, the following US-based social media services (beyond the big three) have over 100M MAUs: TikTok, Snapchat, Pinterest, Reddit, Quora, Skype, LinkedIn, Microsoft Teams, imo/PageBites (who?) [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 7:21 am
Microsoft Corporation v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:53 am
See Barnes v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
It started with this quote from Bill Gates, Microsoft’s co-founder: It’s always surprising how old concepts carry into the new medium. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm
Lohmus, Havel & Viisemann, et al in 2005. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
Which is strange, because during this time she is mentioned in a November 2, 2001 Justice Department press release as the contact for public comments on the DOJ consent decree with Microsoft–at which point she was the lower rank of “Trial Attorney” before being promoted to Section Chief in January 2002: The proposed Final Judgment will be published by the Federal Register, along with the Department’s Competitive Impact Statement, as required by the… [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:29 am
Templeton et al, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that grants of restricted stock units, or RSUs, to directors of Citrix Systems, Inc. were subject to an entire fairness standard of review. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
Lemley et al., Life After Bilski, 63 Stan. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am
., et al. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
” In truth, however, the bill addresses a wish list for large corporate interests. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:46 am
SAP America, Inc., et. al. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:12 am
Since Microsoft began as a start-up company, it has risen to be within the top 50 of America’s largest corporations by taking calculated risks. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:59 am
Computer Packages, Inc., et. al. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 2:28 pm
Microsoft v. i4i, Docket No. 10–290 (Supreme Court 2011) Briefing has begun in earnest. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:10 pm
The judge, in a 1,600-page decision in August 2006, ruled that the nine companies and two trade groups had engaged in a scheme to defraud smokers and potential smokers by falsely denying smoking’s health hazards, its addictive nature, the industry’s manipulation of cigarettes to assure more nicotine delivery, the intentional marketing of cigarettes to youth, and second-hand smoke as a cause of diseases. [read post]
