Search for: "Pair v. Doe 1 et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 81
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2024, 7:38 am
OpenAI, Inc. et al., 1:24-CV-01515 (S.D.N.Y.). [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
From crowd-sourcing and domain squatting websites for the next U.S. president to a frame-by-frame recreation of the entire Bee movie, MSCHF is redefining what it means to challenge norms of traditional art and law.[1] With antics including a “Ketchup or Makeup” art drop in collaboration with Rihanna’s Fenty Beauty brand or a series of fake Andy Warhols amidst an original, this art collective is certainly causing a bit of MSCHF and testing the extent of creativity in art… [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:20 am
Ruchala et al., Megavoltage CT image reconstruction during tomotherapy treatments, Phys. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:55 am
A firm implementing its own AI system does not guarantee victory. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:02 am
It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food handling or cooking.[43] Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS) E. coli O157:H7 infections can lead to a severe, life-threatening complication called hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS).[44] HUS accounts for the majority of the acute deaths and chronic injuries caused by the… [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 9:16 am
McCoy et al. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 10:59 am
In Rider et al v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
These activities are conducted on a large scale, with estimates of the total amount of corporate tax avoidance ranging from $212 billion (Tørsløv et al., 2022) to $600 billion (Crivelli et al., 2015). [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Heller v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 11:00 am
Yet in the ongoing case, Conor Woulfe et al v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am
A year-long subscription is $35.99.[9] How does AI create the avatars? [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
If a work of art doesn’t meet all three of these requirements, then it does not qualify for copyright protection. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
If a work of art doesn’t meet all three of these requirements, then it does not qualify for copyright protection. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 1:45 pm
See Vans, Inc. et. al., v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 8:10 pm
Manitoba et al. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Kehm v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Prior attempts to measure tarnishment: Buccafusco et al 2016 focused on porn parodies, found burnishing except among very conservative consumers. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 9:08 am
The Noco Co v. [read post]
