Search for: "Pantone v. Pantone"
Results 1 - 20
of 70
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2024, 12:16 am
The indication of an internationally recognised colour identification code (such as Pantone or RAL) however constitutes a sufficient graphic representation in itself. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 6:10 am
PANTON v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
In 2013, Cadbury’s registration for Pantone 2685C was held invalid because its description rendered it void for lack of certainty. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:08 am
DBA Comptime Digital Printing v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:27 am
Mr Justice Meade of the High Court recently handed down judgment in Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. v Cadbury UK Limited [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch). [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 1:30 am
The first case was CJEU decision in Libertel Groep BV v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 1:30 am
The first case was CJEU decision in Libertel Groep BV v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 2:06 am
Mark description: “The colour purple (Pantone 2685C), shown on the form of application. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 3:57 am
See Yamaha Int'l Corp. v Hoshino Gakki Co. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 3:40 am
T-101/15 and T-102/15 Red Bull v EUIPO. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 4:58 am
Infringement will be covered in Illumina v MGI - Part 2. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm
The UKIPO Hearing Officer was persuaded that without better particularisation (such as a Pantone number) the mark must be held invalid under the general Sieckmann pri [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:12 am
Poly-America, L.P. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:22 am
The absence of any statement about hue (such as a Pantone number) was all the more striking because the description did expressly limit the shape to particular dimensions shown in the picture. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks1. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 7:15 am
In the case of Nestlé Colombia v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 12:52 am
The mark (AKA Pantone 2685C)Cadbury UK Ltd v The Comptroller General of Patents Designs And Trade Marks [2018] EWCA Civ 2715.This appeal concerned Cadbury's attempt to amend the description of the mark:The mark consists of the colour purple, as shown on the form of application, applied to the whole visible surface, or being the predominant colour applied to the whole visible surface, of the packaging of the goods. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 2:45 am
Cadbury UK Ltd v The Comptroller General of Patents Designs And Trade Marks [2018] EWCA Civ 2715 (05 December 2018) is an unedifying case. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 10:35 am
Informed by Panton v Everywoman’s Health Centre Society (1988), 2000 BCCA 621, the test of establishing just cause is “an objective one, viewed through the lens of a reasonable employer taking account of all relevant circumstances. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
What about the Pantone number? [read post]
