Search for: "Parcell v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,744
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2014, 7:36 am
United States Parcel... [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:41 am
Professors Naomi Cahn & June Carbone, on the GWU Law Review blog: At the core of the Court’s decision in Young v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 6:45 am
Wisconsin: is taking a sub-parcel of land compensable? [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
The Appellate Division upheld the rezoning of a parcel from commercial to high density residential, despite the provisions of the local comprehensive plan and the failure to prepare an environmental impact statement. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
The Appellate Division upheld the rezoning of a parcel from commercial to high density residential, despite the provisions of the local comprehensive plan and the failure to prepare an environmental impact statement. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
The Supreme Court of the United States recently issued its decision in Young v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 12:00 am
On March 22, 2017, we blogged about the importance of the United States Supreme Court’s looming decision in Murr v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 8:33 am
United Parcel Service. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 7:19 am
Rasmussen v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 3:33 pm
In Black Hills Investments, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 7:45 am
Bridge Aina Lea, LLC v State of Hawaii Land Use Commission, 2016 WL 797567 (D. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 9:15 pm
Thus, the court held that the Board’s conclusion that 21 Seabran’s parcel needed 200 feet of frontage for every 300 gallons per day of wastewater was erroneous. 21 Seabran, LLC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 2:35 pm
(See Narstedt v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:10 am
In Lost Tree Village Corporation v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 1:43 pm
Gidney v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 3:15 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court in Murr v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 11:59 am
Village of Islandia v Commissioner Richard A. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 1:27 am
Krauser.John Ellwood Hinebaugh devised a large parcel of land to the Sebolds provided they, among other things, did not alienate their interest in the property and continued to farm it. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
Hansen Lost Tree Village Corp. v. [read post]