Search for: "Parker v. Holder"
Results 1 - 20
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
County of Mono v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
In 2012, Attorney General Holder issued a statement (Holder Memo) outlining the DOJ’s policy on coordinating parallel civil and criminal proceedings to enforce against fraud. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm
Of course, Silberman decided Parker v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
” Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:17 am
The anti-patent-right-expansion policy of Deepsouth was repeated in Parker v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:20 pm
Nev. 2006); accord Parker v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am
The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am
The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am
The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am
The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:19 am
International Value Advisers, LLC, May 20, 2020, Parker, B., and Rubenstein v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:25 am
If the Court followed the interpretation of Article 8(2) as advanced by Constantin Film, it would upset “the balance that was struck by the EU legislature in such a way as to favour the interests of holders of intellectual property rights. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
By letter dated July 13, 2009, several dozen national associations and large corporate entities (ranging from the American Hospital Association to Exxon Mobile Corporation), wrote to Attorney General Eric Holder to express their concerns that the redelegation of issuance authority may lead to problems with: “consistency, coordination, institutional memory, and a variety of other issues that overbroad delegation would raise. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 4:03 pm
Katz in a widely read blog entitled Access Copyright v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
The finding of the Parker Commission was overturned by the Federal Court in 2004 in Stevens v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:45 am
Parker v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:19 am
” The dental permits expire one year after the issuance date or whenever the permit holder is no longer associated with the Mobile Dental Facility or Portable Dental Unit, whichever is sooner. [read post]
