Search for: "Patterson v. Domino's Pizza"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
at *7 (quoting Goro v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
at *7 (quoting Goro v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 8:49 am
In addition to a review of these definitions, the court applied Patterson v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:48 am
Domino’s Pizza, Curry v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 12:04 pm
The court relied on the California Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Patterson v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 6:51 am
The district court recognized that “no binding decision ha[d] addressed the standard applicable to determining whether a franchisor is an employer of a franchisee,” and “in the absence of controlling authority” it applied the standard from Martinez v Combs, with the gloss of Patterson v Domino’s Pizza, LLC . [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 7:29 am
Domino’s Pizza—which permitted 7-Eleven to exercise the control necessary to protect its trademarks, brand, and goodwill. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 2:42 pm
Patterson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 2:17 pm
Domino’s Pizza. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 10:40 pm
Domino’s Pizza. 4. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:46 am
Domino’s Pizza, LLC? [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 7:07 am
However, it is notable that in Patterson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 7:07 am
However, it is notable that in Patterson v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm
” In a fourth major employment case, Patterson v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 10:29 am
Patterson v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:29 am
Patterson v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:29 am
Patterson v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
In Taylor Patterson v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 6:46 am
Justice Werdegar dissented, finding questions on whether Domino’s retained power over termination based on testimony that its “area leader” suggested the franchisee “get rid of” certain employees (Patterson v Domino’s Pizza, LLC, August 28, 2014, Baxter, M). [read post]
