Search for: "Paul McCormack" Results 1 - 20 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2023, 8:01 pm by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
I started out my career at Paul Weiss in New York, as a litigator, I spent most of my career in government, I actually worked in in Alaska and Washington state where I live now and in Seattle, you know, as an assistant attorney general. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:13 pm by Scott Bomboy
Blaine, Thomas Reed, Joseph Cannon, Champ Clark, Sam Rayburn, Joseph Martin, John McCormack, Tip O’Neill, and Newt Gingrich. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am by INFORRM
Craig Wright, despite finding that Peter McCormack had caused serious damage to his reputation, Wright v McCormack [2023] EWCA Civ 892. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
A preliminary trial on meaning due to be heard last week has had to be relisted after actor Noel Clarke disinstructed his legal advisors shortly before the hearing. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
Huw Edwards has been named as the BBC presenter accused of paying a teenager for sexually explicit photographs. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
A leading BBC presenter has been taken off air pending an investigation after claims emerged that he paid a teenager more than £35,000 for sexual images. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
On 27 June 2023 the House of Lords approved an amendment to the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill which aims to tackle “strategic litigation against public participation” (“SLAPPs”); the use of defamation law to silence critics. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
On 20 June 2023, Fancourt J mentioned over two dozen names of Mirror Group employees that he suggested could have given evidence before him in the ongoing trial over alleged unlawful information gathering. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On 15 June 2023, the Court of Appeal (Singh, Andrews and Warby LJJ) heard the claimant’s appeal in the case of Wright v McCormack. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
The Hilary Legal Term ends on Wednesday 5 April 2023. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 12 January 2023 there was a directions hearing in the case of Wright v McCormack before Nicklin J. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
On 20 December 2022, Chamberlain J heard costs applications in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 9:29 am by Scott Bomboy
Blaine, Thomas Reed, Joseph Cannon, Champ Clark, Sam Rayburn, Joseph Martin, John McCormack, Tip O’Neill, and Newt Gingrich. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:20 pm by Howard Bashman
“Chief Justice Bridget McCormack leaving the Michigan Supreme Court”: Paul Egan of The Detroit Free Press has this report. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 1 August 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB) by Chamberlain J. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
The Trinity Legal Term ended on Friday 29 July 2022. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
On 20 July 2022, the Government published its Response to the Call for Evidence on Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation [pdf]. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am by INFORRM
Research and Resources Douglas, Michael, Publication of Defamation by Encouraging Third Party Comments on Social Media (2022), Law Quarterly Review 362 Dias, Talita, Tackling Online Hate Speech through Content Moderation: The Legal Framework Under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (2022), Bahador, Hammer and Livingston (eds), Countering online hate and its offline consequences in conflict-fragile settings (Forthcoming) Saujan, Iqbal, The Right to Information Act and its… [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am by INFORRM
The Law Commission has published its final report (pdf) on reforming the criminal law as it relates to intimate image abuse. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
The Ada Lovelace Institute has published an independent review of the UK’s regulation of biometric technologies, authored by Matthew Ryder QC, which found that the UK requires “an ambitious new legislative framework specific to biometrics,” as the current regulatory regime is “fragmented, confused and failing to keep pace. [read post]