Search for: "Paul v. Board of Zoning Appeals"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2024, 3:24 am
TTABlogger comment: This decision does not bode well for Professor Curtin's appeal of the Board's RAPUNZEL decision. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
It is named after the Supreme Court’s 1984 opinion in Chevron v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Paul Gosar, Rep. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
Paul J. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 6:44 am
An administrative law judge, the Baltimore County Board of Appeals, and the Circuit Court for Baltimore County ... [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:02 am
From Bauer v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:29 am
[A company had a trademark canceled in a Trademark Trial & Appeal Board proceeding, based on what the Board described as the company's "delaying tactics, including the willful disregard of Board orders. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:02 am
[A company had a trademark canceled in a Trademark Trial & Appeal Board proceeding, based on what the Board described as the company's "delaying tactics, including the willful disregard of Board orders. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 7:17 pm
A 2011 Ontario Municipal Board decision was upheld by the Divisional Court in Rosen v. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 3:50 pm
Zoning Board of Appeals, 233 Conn. 198, 206, 658 A.2d 559 (1995). [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
Australia On 18 October 2019 the Supreme Court of Queensland Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Harbour Radio v Wagner [2019] QCA 221. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 11:06 am
I understand Barr’s argument as essentially saying that, even though Americans are highly dependent on a vulnerable digital infrastructure that encryption helps protect (more on that later), in order to have a functioning civil society, we should not tolerate “law-free zones” where encryption facilitates and protects a wide range of threat actors and imposes huge costs on public safety officials, crime victims and society in general. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 5:32 pm
Brandywine Senior Living at Potomac, LLC v Paul, 237 MD App. 195 (MD 4/30/2018) [read post]
22 May 2018, 8:00 pm
” Accordingly, the court affirmed the opinion of the Montgomery County Board of Appeals and remanded the case to the circuit court for entry of an order affirming the actions of the Board. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 6:14 am
Marshall v Charlestown Township Board of Supervisors, 2017 WL 3707506 (PA Cmlth 8/29/2017)Filed under: Zoning - Interpretation [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 3:58 pm
Specht v Big Water Town, 2017 WL 1788368 (5/4/2017)Filed under: Variances [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:33 pm
|Fordham 25|Unwired Planet v Huawei: Is FRAND now a competition law free zone? [read post]
9 May 2017, 10:56 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:11 am
Plaintiff’s fight with defendants wound its way through the planning commission and zoning board, the circuit court, and even included an appeal to the Court of Appeals. [read post]
