Search for: "Paul v. Dept. of Human Services of: Paul"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
That tribunal had been the subject of widespread and high-level criticism in relation to its fairness and independence, including from the US Dept of State and the Bar Human Rights Committee. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Dept. of Correctional Servs. v Kinsella, 220 AD2d 19, 22). [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Dept. of Correctional Servs. v Kinsella, 220 AD2d 19, 22). [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
Dept. of Correctional Servs. v Kinsella, 220 AD2d 19, 22). [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
Dept. of Correctional Servs. v Kinsella, 220 AD2d 19, 22). [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
According to court documents, Aria Taheri defamed Register UK editor Paul Kunert and reporter Gareth Corfield with a series of highly defamatory Twitter messages, articles and a paid-for Google advert. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Our response to the trilemma should be informed by an understanding of lawyers’ cognition patterns qua humans 3. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
The trend was especially evident in the governance of behavior traditionally beyond the reach of states—transnational economic activity.[10] There was a sense that the appropriate approach to the management of behavior (by states or private institutions) was increasingly centered on the ability of decision makers to deploy data within algorithms to develop finely tuned systems of reward and punishment, which would manage appropriate behavior, hold individuals accountable, and contribute to… [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Gene Editing Judith Daar, University of California Irvine School of Law, Human Germline Genome Editing: Dilemmas in Informed Consent Eileen Kane, Penn State Law, A Volatile Year in Human Genome Editing Myrisha Lewis, Howard University School of Law, The Coming Age of Gene Editing: Medical Promise, Regulation, and the Revival of Decades of Debate Maxwell Mehlman, Case Western Reserve University, Regulating Do-It-Yourself Gene Editing C. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
The Final RegulationsThis past Tuesday the government published in the Federal Register a series of final rules issued a few days earlier by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and Treasury. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
(IIT v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:26 pm
Dept. of Health & Human Services v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 1:45 pm
Dept. of Human Services, 312 N.J. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm
The language appears to have been added to SF 1908 in the House Health and Human Services Committee on April 18, 1997 with the adoption of the MB34 amendment. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
(Abbott) v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Salazar, No. 08-1097ADEA - Burdens of proof + bifurcation issueso o SCOTUS docket hereFederal Appellate Court DecisionsØ Ø Paul Mollica's Daily Developments in EEO Law here5th Circuit> Braymiller v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
Clearlake Rehabilitation Hospital Inc (Race (B))Paul v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Paul Mollica calls this a genuine head-scratcher] Cox v. [read post]
