Search for: "Pelosi v. Pelosi"
Results 1 - 20
of 320
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
Circuit’s decision in Blassingame v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
Today the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
The Administration might claim that Pelosi's trip nonetheless was aimed to "defeat the measures of the United States," namely the measures aimed at isolating Syria, but could Pelosi be shown to have had the "intent" to do so? [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 9:16 am
(See DSM-V). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
He would joke about what a shame it was that he did not get his hands on Nancy Pelosi’s computer, given what he might have found. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 3:59 am
” In Snyder v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
The authorities said he told investigators he intended to take hostage Pelosi, long a subject of virulent attacks by right-wing leaders and pundits. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:01 pm
House floor, then-Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) declared that (ultimately failed) legislation to restore net neutrality would, inter alia, protect young people’s “jobs and their futures”; give “entrepreneurs and small businesses a level playing field on which to compete, and ensure that American innovation can continue to be the envy of the world”; “make all the difference in the world, guaranteeing a better, cheaper internet for everyone… [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 7:00 am
The Court of Appeals affirms the conviction and the sentence and further holds the trial court did not violate the Sixth Amendment in closing the courtroom during trial to deal with the COVID-19 threat.The case is U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:00 am
Then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
See Whitman v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:13 pm
Its roots are in the Supreme Court's 1943 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
In Severino v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:49 am
Serious standing issues aside, Biden v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 3:13 pm
Fight Nancy Pelosi and the cop who caught you speeding now! [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
He points to the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
And I want to give special recognition to someone who I think will be considered the greatest Speaker in the history of this country, Nancy Pelosi. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:10 am
That was before the Supreme Court recognized that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to gun ownership in District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:57 am
I described then the legal landscape in which their motions to transfer venue are playing out, which is largely set by the District of Columbia Circuit’s binding, en banc 1976 ruling in United States v. [read post]
