Search for: "Pelts v. Pelts"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
National Security Archive v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:59 am
Here are the materials in Van Pelt III v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 9:00 pm
As liars go, Lucy van Pelt was a pro. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 10:15 pm
" Although the Supreme Court permits many more First Amendment limitations on school grounds than off, Hazelwood School Dist. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:30 am
When I teach Pierson v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:35 pm
Riley v Murray, then, sits uncomfortably with the Court of Appeal’s decision in Miller v College of Policing [2021] EWCA Civ 1926, which was handed down on the same day. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 7:23 pm
When an appellant successfully challenges a conviction which followed a trial, the imposition of an increased sentence after a retrial is presumed to violate the Due Process Clause of the New York State Constitution, even where the retrial is before a different judge than imposed the original sentence (People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 158 [1990]). [read post]
10 May 2015, 10:42 pm
Fredlund v Eureka Township Board of Supervisors, 2015 WL 1880218 (MN App. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:45 am
Above is an introductory video on King v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
See Harmelin v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
National Blog Barry SookmanCASL gets Rogers Media The CRTC announced yesterday that it bagged another CASL pelt – this time Rogers Media. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:16 am
But when we do have both sides available to us, we present them.In the case of the People v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
In Bibi v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 8:36 pm
: Rihanna’s “Robyn” Registration Opposed by DC Comic Doug Schoen : The Patent Process in America is Broken Joe Mullin: “Copyright trolling” Movie Studio gets hit with Godzilla-Sized Lawsuit Michael Borella : Allvoice v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:46 pm
John Duffy: The Supreme Court Reverses Another Federal Circuit Patent Case Gene Quinn: Industry Reaction To SCOTUS Decision In Sandoz v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 10:58 am
United States of America v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:44 pm
Supreme Court heard argument for the second time in the case of Hernandez v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:44 am
For that reason, this fellow loses his criminal appeal.The case is United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:59 am
Reversed and Remanded.Case Name: TED NOBLES v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:32 pm
The Court held that"The threshold issue in evaluating whether a resentence is vindictive is whether the resentence is more severe than that originally imposed" (People v Cahill, 46 AD3d 1455, 1456; see generally People v Young, 94 NY2d 171, 176-177, rearg denied 94 NY2d 876; People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 159-160), and a determinate sentence of 25 years is of course more severe than one of 20 years. [read post]
