Search for: "People v. Favor" Results 1 - 20 of 11,565
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 1:07 pm by Stephen E. Sachs
" For years, many people had assumed that opposing the Supreme Court's decisions in Roe v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Defendant cross-moved for summary judgment seeking declaratory judgment in its favor on the constitutionality of Executive Law § 94. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Defendant cross-moved for summary judgment seeking declaratory judgment in its favor on the constitutionality of Executive Law § 94. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am by Eric Goldman
Most people think that the hiQ Labs opinion was the most favorable legal decision for web scrapers, except for the fact that the final disposition was exactly the opposite. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am by Stuart Kaplow
Last year, the state court ruled in favor of the 16 youth plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am by Russell Knight
” 735 ILCS 5/12-107 This prohibition on imprisoning people for mere debt does not ring true in an Illinois divorce court. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]