Search for: "People v. Giles"
Results 1 - 20
of 212
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
As Hasen recounts (p. 23), the Supreme Court shamefully refused to intervene in Alabama’s blatantly racist denial of voting rights in Giles v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:21 am
(Cohen, v. 2, p. 9.) [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:54 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during October 2023 The seven consistory court judgments circulated in October relate to Reordering, extensions and other building works, Church Treasures/Sale of Paintings/Loans/Memorials, and Churchyards and burials. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
I only cared about business but not about the people around me. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 11:12 am
Stein, 347 U.S. 201 (1954) and Goldstein v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 8:34 am
In Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am
She appealed, and in Higgs v Farmor’s School [2023] EAT 89 the Appeal Tribunal ruled in her favour, at least provisionally. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 10:59 pm
On 13 October 2017, Wu commenced a proceeding against Yin in the Ningbo People’s Court. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:17 am
From Blankenship v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am
“Loose Canon”: This is the name given to “The scriptures of the “Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster”, De Wilde v The Netherlands [2021] ECHR No 9476/19 at 25; it is also the column in The Guardian written by The Revd Giles Fraser; and is the Loose Cannon Brewery in Abingdon, Oxon. 5. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
Under the current U.S law, owners of the AI technology itself may be the ones with cause for concern – potentially being at risk of copyright infringement lawsuits.[24] AI usually reviews or even contains reproductions of other people’s artwork that it use [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
Under the current U.S law, owners of the AI technology itself may be the ones with cause for concern – potentially being at risk of copyright infringement lawsuits.[24] AI usually reviews or even contains reproductions of other people’s artwork that it use [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
He conceded, however, that in the case of a chancel screen of some intrinsic interest in itself, the act of removing it and re-erecting it elsewhere has some of the characteristics of removing a chattel to another location; and that this made it appropriate to consider, as what he termed “a subsidiary issue”, the extent to which the screen is “part of the heritage and history not only of the church, but also of all the people, present and [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm
Harlan’s moral vision is memorialized in his lone dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 3:07 pm
Selden line. (2) Originality cases, including Burrow-Giles and Harper & Row. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 3:01 pm
Thomas and Justice Amy Coney Barrett highlighted the abuse-of-discretion standard in People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 11:41 pm
Rakusen v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 11:41 pm
Rakusen v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 1:26 am
For more details of the case, see Giles Peaker’s excellent post on Nearly Legal here. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 1:26 am
For more details of the case, see Giles Peaker’s excellent post on Nearly Legal here. [read post]
