Search for: "People v. Lee"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,984
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 3:30 am
& Lee L. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
As a committed socialist, Egilman was incurious about how and why occupational and environmental diseases were so prevalent in socialist and communist countries, where profits are outlawed and the people own the means of production.[2] Like the radical labor historians David Rosner and Gerald Markowitz, Egilman tried to cram the history of silicosis (and even silicosis litigation) into a Marxist narrative of class conflict, economic reductionism, and capitalist greed. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
From Thursday's Tenth Circuit decision in Sun v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:58 pm
On Tuesday, the Court decided Rudisill v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
The trial was recently the center of TV series “The People v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
Justice Lee stated that the evidence may change the outcome of the case and extends beyond Lehrmann’s credibility. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Penn Law Dean Sophia Lee discusses "her work as a legal scholar and historian of administrative law" (Regulatory Review). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am
Smith v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:24 am
., Armstrong v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:16 pm
Referring to the principles of primary jurisdiction and exhaustion outlined in Lee v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 6:41 am
In Rossi v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am
This post provides a brief update.On March 26, Food and Drug Administration v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
Lee. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 8:09 am
Zion Bank v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:03 pm
Reference: People v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
The ICO also published new guidance for all organisations considering using people’s biometric data. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:39 pm
Corfield v. [read post]
