Search for: "People v. Sandoval" Results 1 - 20 of 95
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2024, 3:35 am by SHG
Nor may the prosecution use “prior convictions or proof of the prior commission of specific, criminal, vicious or immoral acts” other than to impeach the accused’s credibility (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371 , 374 [ 1974]). [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am by John Elwood
The rule was designed to address concerns that people who were otherwise prohibited from obtaining firearms could readily obtain parts that they could rapidly assemble into firearms. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm by NARF
Sandoval County, New Mexico (New Mexico Rule of Civil Procedure 19 (Required Joinder of Parties)) Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm by NARF
The impact of climate change on the cultural identity of Indigenous Peoples and the nation’s first “climate refugees”. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:50 am by Evan George
In 1999, the Montana Supreme Court issued a decision in a case called Montana Environmental Information Center v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm by Taylor Ross
In San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The trial tested a rarely used criminal statute meant to ensure that people comply with congressional subpoenas. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm by Donald Thompson
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th  Dept 2006]). [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Some of those very people, however, said Esposito’s claims are greatly embellished, or simply not true. [read post]