Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Marks) (1991)" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 This freedom to speak against the government and government officials is essential in a free society committed to the preeminence of the people. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am by cassieq
He remained in the position until being elected a Pima County Superior Court Judge. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
At trial, plaintiff alleged that the City was liable under a respondeat superior theory for Miller's negligence in shooting plaintiff and for the police department's negligence in planning the raid. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
At trial, plaintiff alleged that the City was liable under a respondeat superior theory for Miller's negligence in shooting plaintiff and for the police department's negligence in planning the raid. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
We lawyers have to keep such secrets about people as part of our jobs, but we're used to it, and we're handsomely compensated for it. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
Roemer, 501 U.S. 380 (1991), where the Court held that section 2 of the Voting Rights Act covers judicial elections. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:27 pm by Kent Scheidegger
S. 225, 231-233 (1991) (discussing appellate courts' "institutional advantages" in giving legal guidance). [read post]