Search for: "People ex rel. Lee v Lee"
Results 1 - 20
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
The results of one study by Hershel Jick and colleagues, presented as a letter to the editor, reported a relative risk of 0.58, with a 95% exact confidence interval, 0.03 – 2.9.[2] A year later, two researches, reporting a study based upon Medicaid databases, found no significant associations with PPA.[3] The FDA, however, did not approve a final monograph for PPA, with recognition of its “safe and effective” status because of occasional reports of hemorrhagic stroke that… [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:24 am
., Armstrong v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:01 pm
No less a figure than Tim Berners-Lee declared the following way back in 2006: Net neutrality is very important. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Judge Lee opined that "An adverse/negative inference based on a missing witness may be appropriate where the moving party has laid a foundation that the witness has knowledge about a material issue, that he would naturally be expected to give testimony favorable to the party who failed to call him, and that the witness is available to that party," citing Comm’n on Human Rights ex rel. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Judge Lee opined that "An adverse/negative inference based on a missing witness may be appropriate where the moving party has laid a foundation that the witness has knowledge about a material issue, that he would naturally be expected to give testimony favorable to the party who failed to call him, and that the witness is available to that party," citing Comm’n on Human Rights ex rel. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Tort tries to get people to make safer products to encourage innovation, but also leads to anxieties about creating new stuff b/c it risks litigation v. doing what everyone else is already doing. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 6:20 am
Relatives of Mr. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
First up is United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
Casey and Roe v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
The pageant does limit itself to people "born … Female with Female Anatomy. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court decision in 2013, and another this year, weakened the landmark law, while Republican-controlled Legislatures passed new voting restrictions advocates say target people of color, as well as young and working-class people. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 8:22 am
” Lee v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
In McNally v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 5:31 pm
See C.R. ex rel. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
We all cite the Lee et al study on identifying terms as trademarks by their placement on the package, but what about replicability? [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
There is some copying—trunk hump on BMW—but it’s relatively rare to copy car bodies. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
But if Trump did not originally inspire the gunman, he has brought into the mainstream polarizing ideas and people once consigned to the fringes of American society. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:00 am
Under the misappropriation theory endorsed by the Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
