Search for: "People v Borden"
Results 1 - 20
of 67
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 3:43 pm
Speedway v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
Lemley: his instinct is for standards so that they adapt, but he gets that people have different preferences. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Borden was wrong and we were right to broaden the concept of confusion, but many things ignore that changes in the law move people’s perceptions as well. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 8:25 pm
ShareIn Borden v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 9:00 am
Mississippi (Nov. 3) Attorney Kannon Shanmugam, Borden v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 10:04 am
In Tuesday’s oral argument in Borden v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 10:00 am
” In Borden v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm
Borden decision, which involved the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act, and again in its 1945 Georgia v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 12:42 pm
Between 1901 and 1961, the state’s population increased from over 2 million people, of whom nearly 500,000 were eligible voters to over 3.5 million people, of whom over 2 million were eligible voters. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 6:55 am
Under Article FIL 18, it is stated that: “local people’s governments at or above the county level (县级以上) may develop further foreign investment promotion and facilitation policies and measures within their existing statutory powers. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
Enfranchisement of Indigenous people did not fully occur until 1960. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am
(McKenna, 104-105) (quoting Rolex Watch U.S.A. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
Does any of them have a program the purpose of which is to solve the A2J problem that is the unaffordability of legal services for the majority of the population that is middle and lower income people? [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm
Supreme Court in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 8:08 pm
In Hunter et al. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:24 am
Supreme Court's ruling in Hurst v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 1:11 am
In looking at the trademark's reputation in the UK, the first limb of the test under the subsection, the judge saw that reputation in relation to the trademark only existed with the people who had bought a flagpole bearing the trademark. [read post]
