Search for: "People v CAMPBELL (BRIAN)"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
They point to the 1994 Supreme Court case of Campbell v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
That test is a crystallisation of a process first articulated in Campbell the same year (Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457), a case I’ll come back to. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
Misleading people and the purveying as facts statements which are not true is destructive of the democratic society and should form no part of such a society. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:40 pm
” “Most academic connections are developed along the lines of narrowly defined intellectual interests,” said James V. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:43 pm
– Brian Cathcart Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Sara Mansoori Case Law: “Spiller v Joseph – the New Defence of Honest Comment” – Catherine Rhind Case Law: Iqbal v Dean Manson, harassment by letter – Edward Craven Defamation Act 2013: The public interest defence and digital communications – Jacob Rowbottom Case Law: Růžový… [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:46 am
Panelists include Yasser Abu Jamei, Brian K. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:19 pm
IN SUPPORTArt Neill New Media RightsElizabeth Rosenblatt Organization for Transformative WorksJack Lerner, Brian Tamsut, and Jovan C. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
One of the more incredible allegations about Prenda Law, the copyright-trolling operation that sued people for downloading movies online, was that the lawyers behind Prenda and its associated companies might have created and uploaded some of the porn, simply as a way of catching more offenders. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am
The first was Christie v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:07 pm
The Court declined to decide between its decision in Campbell v MGN (No. 2) [2005] UKHL 61 (upholding CFAs in media cases) and MGN v UK 39401/04 [2011] ECHR 919 (holding that the recovery of additional liabilities was incompatible with the right to freedom of expression in Article 10) and moved the bastion for CFA clients and their lawyers to Article 1 of the First Protocol of the European Convention (“A1P1”). [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
Canada The case of Hudspeth v Whatcott 2017 ONSC 1708 concerned a proposed class action on behalf of 500,000 people who marched on the 2016 Pride Toronto Parade. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Campbell’s Campaign for Legal Justice by Constance Backhouse and Nancy Backhouse The Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, 1754-2004; From Imperial Bastion to Provincial Oracle edited by Philip Girard, Jim Phillips & Barry Cahill 2003 Brian Dickson: A Judge’s Journey by Robert Sharpe and Kent Roach The Conventional Man: The Diaries of Ontario Chief Justice Robert A Harrison, 1856-1878 edited with an introduction by Peter Oliver John J. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:20 pm
Wall v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
Campbell, 378 Mass. 680 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1979).Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am
“Predictions about the future might appear to be difficult, but Niels Bohr, and perhaps three other influential people, might have been astonished to learn we have been fortunate to compile a long list of rather pragmatic predictions for the legal industry in 2015. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm
Campbell’s Campaign for Legal Justice by Constance Backhouse and Nancy BackhouseThe Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, 1754-2004; From Imperial Bastion to Provincial Oracle edited by Philip Girard, Jim Phillips & Barry Cahill 2003Brian Dickson: A Judge’s Journey by Robert Sharpe and Kent RoachThe Conventional Man: The Diaries of Ontario Chief Justice Robert A Harrison, 1856-1878 edited with an introduction by Peter OliverJohn J. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
It is reported that Guantanamo inmate Shaker Aamer is to sue the British Government for defamation on the basis that US interrogators were supplied with “knowingly false information” by the UK security services, including the allegation that Mr Aamer was paid directly by Bin Laden and that he also recruited people to fight for al-Qaeda in Afghanistan Naomi Campbell is to pursue a libel claim against the Daily Telegraph, concerning an article about her… [read post]
