Search for: "People v Carrion"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2015, 3:43 am
Roederer v J Garcia Carrion S.A. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:29 am
The style of the case is Mendoza v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 12:58 pm
People v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) Intangible assets: The 900 pound overlooked economic gurerrilla… (Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) Global – Patents Do poor people like different patents to rich people? [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:13 am
And so too will the fine people of Prague, Doc Martin included.In Tinker v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
Topics this month include:Top StoriesUS v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Chavez, No. 054679, 055401 Convictions for narcotics conspiracy and possession of a silencer-equipped firearm in furtherance of that conspiracy and imposing consecutive sentences for co-defendant's two offenses are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence was insufficient to support their conviction; and 2) their sentences were unreasonable U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, December 08, 2008 Carrion v. [read post]
