Search for: "People v David S."
Results 1 - 20
of 5,797
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court, in the seminal case of Michigan v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 4:53 am
It is also important to note that, after the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:16 am
In People v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm
See, e.g., Ann Marimow’s article in the Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/06/07/judge-david-tatel-supreme-court-memoir/, and Joan Biskupic’s for CNN, https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/29/politics/david-tatel-john-roberts-supreme-court-ruth-bader-ginsburg/index.html). [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 8:10 am
Many of those cases wound up being cited in Justice Gorsuch's concurring opinion in SFSA v. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court in 1975 in Taylor v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 11:44 am
v=PmSDoty1gtg&feature=youtu.be [2] United Nations. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 11:44 am
v=PmSDoty1gtg&feature=youtu.be [2] United Nations. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm
In the 2014 Noel Canning v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:33 pm
Snell v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 5:52 am
It’s been Okay, great. [read post]
23 May 2024, 9:01 pm
”The assertion that because Judge Merchan was born in Bogotá, Colombia, he hates Trump is, as The Atlantic’s David Graham writes, “More than simple bigotry, Trump’s remarks about Merchan are an attack on the bedrock of the American justice system, part of his assault on the rule of law itself. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:28 am
From Tuesday's decision in Robertson v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:27 am
Overall, though, the panelists seemed more interested in the public’s reaction to the Court’s apparent politically motivated decisions rather than to changes in the Court’s composition. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:00 pm
It’s true that CFPB v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
" But even assuming that reasonable people could disagree about those points, the obvious antisemitic and anti-American campus incidents are too numerous to list comprehensively. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:18 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]