Search for: "People v Dogan"
Results 1 - 20
of 67
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm
Stacey Dogan: role of human agency in private actions in an increasingly AI-driven world. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
That could also address some of the Article III standing issues I’ve been encouraging people to raise. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
Earliest surveys—1921 Coca-Cola v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
Lemley: his instinct is for standards so that they adapt, but he gets that people have different preferences. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
This prioritizes property over people. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Rogers v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:12 am
Introduction: Stacey Dogan Categorize rules as norm shaping v. norm following. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Sarah Burstein: Reichman is worried that designs can’t satisfy nonobviousness—but the Federal Circuit has removed constraints.Reichman: the Fed Cir has improved it; but still, nonobviousness means that people don’t apply—the lawyers tell the designer there’s no chance. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
They raise the price, eliminate competition, cut people out, transfer consumer surplus to themselves—but they are also giving something to people who canafford the chair: a chair with more narrative and thus more market value. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:42 am
W/in institutions (schools, guilds, etc.) differences b/t the kinds of people who call themselves engineers and those who call themselves designers—histories, including gendered histories, of this. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
YSL v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:31 am
Keeble v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
INS v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
Any general claims about distinctiveness must take into account: eligibility for protection/scope of protection; reality v. policy; words v. non-words; perception by single consumers v. aggregate; consumer search costs approach v. product goodwill approach; US v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 7:09 am
Dogan: compare here w/Europe—is the thought process of designers different w/an assumption of robust protection? [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:07 pm
Lots of people frame their problems as © problems; Google v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:54 am
Mark Lemley and Stacey Dogan, among others, have argued that this shouldn’t be understood as trademark use, but at the very least it has both commercial and message-delivering aspects. [read post]
