Search for: "People v Dyson" Results 1 - 20 of 107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
On 27 February 2024, judgment on meaning was handed down by Lewis J in the long-running litigation between the Dyson Group companies and the broadcasters Channel 4 and ITN, Dyson Technology Ltd & Anor v Channel Four Television Corporation & Anor [2024] EWHC 400 (KB). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
The ICO also published new guidance for all organisations considering using people’s biometric data. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
” The ICO released guidance on how data protection obligations can be met while ensuring people still have access to information. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The recent judgment in Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092, in which the Defendant publisher succeeded in its defence of honest opinion, provides important authority on the interpretation of section 3(4)(a) of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 1 December 2023, Jay J handed down judgment in Dyson v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Dyson v Channel 4, heard 15 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Amersi v BBC, heard 8 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Shafi v New Vision TV Limited and another, heard 4 December 2023 (Johnson J) Wilson v Mendelsohn [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Despite their obvious intelligence, capacity for affection, when it comes to toxicology, dogs are not people, although some people act like the less reputable varieties of dogs. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On the same day, there was a trial of a preliminary issue on meaning and comment in the libel case of Dyson v Channel 4 before HHJ Lewis. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
You cannot expect to utilise AI in your products or services without considering privacy, data protection and how you will safeguard people’s rights. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
On 1 December 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in favour of the defendant in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
GB News fired host Laurence Fox after more than 8,800 people complained to Ofcom about derogatory remarks he made about a female journalist, Ava Evans. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
In Dyson v Channel Four Television Corporation [2022] EWHC 2718 (KB) (31 October 2022) at first instance, Nicklin J said: 18. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
On Friday 21 July 2023 there was a hearing in the case of Iqbal v Geo TV Limited. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
IPSO 12126-22 Nash, Waugh and The Lighthouse Group v The Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2023), 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation 09772-23 Peet v Sunday People, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 14431-23 Resolution Statement Booley v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 16942-23 Hood v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1… [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, Fancourt J heard two applications in Duke of Sussex v NGN. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
On 27 June 2023, the Court of Appeal (Dingemans, Birss and Warby LJJ) heard the claimants’ appeal in the case of Dyson v Channel 4. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
The list included former Daily Mirror editor Piers Morgan and former People editor Neil Wallis. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:29 am by CMS
This was a group of claims brought by people who had witnessed the Hillsborough disaster (some in person, some watching events play out on television). [read post]