Search for: "People v Gill (Richard)" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At Politico Magazine, Richard Primus considers the implications of the decision in Masterpiece for Trump v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” For USA Today, Richard Wolf contrasts Benisek with Gill v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary on the grant in Benisek comes from Rick Hasen at the Election Law Blog and Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who notes “several differences” between Benisek and the court’s other pending partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Election Law Blog, Christopher Elmendorf and Eric McGhee respond to Justice Neil Gorsuch’s complaint at last week’s oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr notes that the Supreme Court’s high-profile partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” Slate’s Amicus podcast features a discussion of Gill v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
In Time, Thomas Wolf observes that the court’s ruling in Gill v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
 The traceback investigation determined that Sea Port Products Corp. imported the scallops that were later supplied to certain Genki Sushi locations in Hawaii, where ill people reported eating. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:50 am by Quinta Jurecic
Lewis was among those legal advisors disqualified by the order: “We just stopped working on anything involved with United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
 Arguing further, Parliament has given its consent to the making of law by EU institutions to make law in the UK and this a “fundamental constitutional change”. 14.04: The afternoon session has just gotten underway and Patrick Green QC has 30 minutes to present submissions on behalf of the “Expat Interveners” (George Birnie and others). 13.08: The court adjourns and will resume at 14:00. 13.07: Manjit Gill QC concludes his submissions, noting that there is… [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 7:43 am by Isaac Park
But he admits that “it’s been a long time” since he’s read Gideon v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:51 am by Jim Sedor
The money followed a legal but circuitous route turbocharged by the 2014 ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 6:47 pm by Rishabh Bhandari
” Kammen worries that without this preface, “some people with thin skin might take offense” at what he’s about to say. [read post]