Search for: "People v Harrington"
Results 1 - 20
of 146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
In commenting on Murthy v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:29 am
As William Harrington, the U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 10:40 am
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Monday in one of the highest-profile bankruptcies in recent memory: Harrington v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:58 am
The justices will hear oral argument on Dec. 4 in one of their highest-profile bankruptcy cases in recent memory: Harrington v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court will hear Harrington v. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 12:56 pm
Harrington, history prof at Vanderbilt University. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 8:04 pm
Harrington. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
In doing so, he actually hurt many people. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 11:05 am
Harrington, 462 So. 2d 861, 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Valliappan v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:05 pm
Professor Berman summarized the opinions here:In Anthony v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Not in Anyone’s Backyard: Exploring Environmental Inequality under Section 15 of the Charter and Flexibility after Fraser v Canada 2022 27 Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform 19, 2022 CanLIIDocs 952 Larissa Parker is a recent graduate of the McGill Faculty of Law and the 2021 recipient of the David L. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 9:17 am
The court in R v Harrington, 1963 CanLII 675 (BC CA) interpreted the word “transport” to mean to promote the distribution of the narcotic to another. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:56 am
A v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am
In Moore v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
A v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
Lumpkin, 20-7065Issues: (1) Whether, for penalty-phase ineffective assistance of counsel violations, Harrington v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 7:23 am
From Harrington v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
