Search for: "People v Ivey"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 9:06 pm
Kay Ivey signed SB23 just ahead of Florida Gov. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
In Alabama v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:38 am
The appellate court agreed with her, citing the 2000 Florida Supreme Court case of Ivey v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 11:41 am
The approval is in defiance of the US Supreme Court ruling in Allen v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am
Officer was entitled to qualified immunity on First Amendment claim relating to livestreaming of a traffic stop, but claim for Town’s policy against livestreaming may proceed Sharpe v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Justice Department has charged five people for making threats of violence against election workers amid a rising wave of harassment and intimidation tied to the 2020 presidential race, a top official told the Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The trial tested a rarely used criminal statute meant to ensure that people comply with congressional subpoenas. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
The UK GDPR has previously been successful in suing people who may have undesirable/compromising information about an someone on their device. [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:47 am
Trucking Ass’n v. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 1:11 pm
This is according to the test laid down by the Supreme Court in 2017 in Ivey v Genting Casinos. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 10:15 am
For years Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act blocked registrations that disparaged a group of people. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:20 am
Was his conduct dishonest by the standards of ordinary decent people? [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 2:10 pm
New Mexico, though, just rejected that rule a couple of weeks ago (in State v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 10:00 am
“They want to challenge Roe v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:44 am
In a statement issued following her signing of the bill, Ivey described the act as “unenforceable” and directly contrary to the precedent set by Roe v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
The proper construction of s 1(1) The background to this issue, and to the enactment of s 1(1), is the judgment in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC (QB) 1414, in which Tugendhat J considered that there was a “threshold of seriousness” recognised under common law, and in which he favoured a definition that a statement was defamatory if it “… substantially affects in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards [the… [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
The Explanatory Notes refer to Thornton (cited above) and Jameel v The Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2003] EWCA Civ 1694. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am
In Ivey v Genting Casinos, the Supreme Court took as its starting point that the second leg of the Ghosh test required the defendant’s acts to be measured against what “society in general expects” [58]. [read post]
