Search for: "People v Marshall (Guy)" Results 1 - 20 of 119
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Unusually for statutes (as opposed to judicially crafted doctrines, such as the Miranda rule), the Logan Act is named after the supposed bad guy: Dr. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:35 pm
Not really a huge deterrent to participate in these scams if all you're getting -- if you're even caught -- is two days of probation.Though I'm sure he's a nice guy. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
Rybolovlev admitted that it’s hard for him to trust people, but once he does, he trusts them entirely. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Gerald Gunther had been working for decades on the volume on the Marshall Court. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 12:56 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Flames shoot out of the head of the guy in the electric chair. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm by Josh Blackman
Concerning private pacts, Biskupic does a flashback to NFIB v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm by David Kopel
That example is weak, because the Natelson-Kopel argument simply elucidated Chief Justice Marshall's statement in McCulloch v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 5:00 am by Kevin
The court holds that they acted in bad faith and for an improper purpose—and not (as Powell claimed at the hearing) seeking to change the law like Thurgood Marshall did in Brown v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 12:23 pm
  As a result, there are plenty of people like Mr. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
  Berisha sued author Guy Lawson for defamation over his book, “Arms and the Dudes: How Three Stoners From Miami Beach Became the Most Unlikely Gunrunners in History,” purporting to tell the true story of how three young people became international arms dealers. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  As I have written elsewhere, it is a total mystery why John Marshall chose to acknowledge Maryland as a “sovereign state” in McCulloch v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]