Search for: "People v Means" Results 1 - 20 of 28,283
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2024, 6:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Anyway, I think this story will have a life so long as it allows people to call for Justice Alito's recusal. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:42 am by Giles Peaker
Mr C’s position was that of a person in ‘accommodation plus’ need, as per R (Aburas) v London Borough of Southwark (2019) EWHC 2754 (Admin). [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:42 am by Amy Howe
The state court in that case explained that in 1970, in Williams v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 10:46 am by John Floyd
  These factors were the issue squarely before the CCA in Hart v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
To do this they need first-class organizational and people skills and technological proficiency. [read post]
25 May 2024, 8:50 am by Russell Knight
“A trial court, sitting as the trier of fact, may only consider knowledge acquired through the introduction of evidence or through judicial notice” People v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:40 pm by Adil Ahmad Haque
The order is most naturally read to mean that Israel must immediately halt (i) its military offensive in the Rafah Governorate, and (ii) any other action in the Rafah Governorate which may inflict on the Palestinian group in Gaza conditions of life that could bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
People who owned such weapons before the effective date of the law are permitted to retain them, subject to some geographic restrictions on use; otherwise, possession is a crime. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am by INFORRM
As a means of invading privacy, a photograph is particularly intrusive” (Douglas v Hello! [read post]
24 May 2024, 1:49 am by Tessa Shepperson
This means that many important bills making their way through Parliament will be lost. [read post]
23 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”It is hard to counter that view when Justices like Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito flaunt their political sympathies or when the Court trashed its own precedents on the way to overturning Roe v. [read post]