Search for: "People v Ramseur"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2020, 10:43 am
Outside the matrimonial action context, trial courts have also applied the best for all concerned standard when determining ownership and custody of pets (Mitchell v Snider, 51 Misc 3d 1229 [Civ Ct NY Co 2016] [replevin action between former paramours]; Ramseur v Askins, 44 Misc 3d 1209 [A] [Civ Ct Bx Co 2014] [replevin action between nephew and aunt]; see also Hennet v Allan, 543 Misc 3d 542 [SC Albany Co 2014] [citing Travis in determining that the dispute… [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:38 am
Ramseur, ___ N.C. ___, 843 S.E.2d 106 (June 5, 2020) (holding repeal of RJA was unconstitutional as an ex post facto violation and granting evidentiary hearing on the merits of claims) and State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
Anti bias harassment criminal law constitutionalSTATE OF NEW JERSEY V. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:14 am
Assante, 42 Misc.3d 133 (A) (2nd Dept., 2014)) 4) Motivation for wanting the dog (ex: emotional vs. wanting to breed the dog (Ramseur v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 1:26 pm
See People v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 10:40 am
State v. [read post]