Search for: "People v Richmond"
Results 1 - 20
of 450
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
See James v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
See James v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Court House, Richmond Va., during the Davis v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm
Richmond Newspapers v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
See James v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
Del Rio, 241 F.R.D. 154, 159 (S.D.N.Y.2006) (citing Richmond Newspapers v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
They go by various names—Freedom of Information, Right-to-Know, Open Records, or even Sunshine laws—but all share the general concept that because the government is of the people, its documents belong to the people. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
Empirically, in July 2023, the companies listed on the NYSE and Nasdaq employed an estimated 47.226 million people (about 41.317 million if the count is limited to listed companies with U.S. headquarters). [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
See James v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:36 am
Richmond Capital Group LLC, 80 Misc.3d 1213(A) (N.Y. 2023) (enforcement action against loan sharks, ordering a long list of equitable remedies including canceling contracts); People by James v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
Rev. 53, 55 (1878), https://www.jstor.org/stable/i25110155; Editor, 'Interesting Decision as to Disqualification Under the Fourteenth Amendment,' [Richmond, Virginia] Daily Dispatch, Mar. 5, 1869, at 3; 'Does the Fourteenth Amendment Exclude the Disqualified from a State Legislature,' Wheeling [West Virginia] Daily Register, Aug. 30, 1871, at 4; 'Does the Fourteenth Amendment Exclude the Disqualified from a State Legislature,' [Richmond, Virginia]… [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:08 am
Referring to the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 7:30 am
In EvansStarrett PLC v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
In 1989, in City of Richmond v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
Noyb claim that X used the political and religious views of their users to determine whether people should or should not see an ad campaign by the EU Commission’s Directorate General for Migration and Home Affairs. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 8:29 am
City of Richmond and Washington ex rel. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 3:39 am
AI should: (i) comply with equalities legislation; (ii) be inclusive by design; (iii) not discriminate unlawfully or perpetuate such discrimination from “input” data; (iv) meet the needs of those from lower socio-economic groups, older people and disabled people; and (v) generate data that is findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable. [read post]
