Search for: "People v Sobers"
Results 1 - 20
of 330
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
It's sobering that of all the times they could have discovered free-speech maximalism – and should have owned the hypocrisy – they've done so now to protect rank antisemitism. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:11 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
In commenting on Murthy v. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Marion County or Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am
And don’t get me started on the Reasonably Scared Cop Rule of Graham v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 10:48 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:40 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
This freedom to speak against the government and government officials is essential in a free society committed to the preeminence of the people. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:26 am
In Bohnak v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:35 pm
Plaintiffs can demonstrate this by proffering evidence of policies and procedures ensuring the sober living home serves or will serve people with actual disabilities (as well as evidence of adherence to these policies and procedures), such as admissions criteria and house rules. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 10:15 am
Sober gray suits, for example. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 4:45 am
Judge Smith cites a prior ruling in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 2:54 pm
See Teter v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
The headline in The Economist reads: “A new Supreme Court case may dampen protections for LGBT people. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 4:44 am
The city said it wanted to ban the use of the drugs even by people who are still sober for the moment. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
Writing a book is a solitary experience, and it is just wonderful to have so many people I admire commenting on my work. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:29 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
