Search for: "People v Stanford"
Results 1 - 20
of 865
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
It is arguably a necessary power in order to meet the contingencies that arise over time.In the leading American case, Jackson v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm
Rich Ford: Tell us about Brown v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
You said, "There's just a big difference between saying someone should quit Stanford, Yale and go to a different school and saying that you should resign from a student organization. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” The Supreme Court held in International Union, UAW v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:00 pm
Some people really like their guns, and some people really don't like any government involvement with them at all. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:56 am
Let’s talk about Easha’s first case, Murray v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
But most all rules I have ever seen—especially in public address settings—do not go that far; they simply prevent “disruption” the way Stanford’s (and seemingly Maryland’s) own rules apparently do.So what can/ought we do with people who engage in shouting down? [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court issued the decision in Roe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:25 am
I wondered if they would yell at me or other people going into the talk, à la the Stanford law students who shouted "shame, shame" at attendees of Judge Kyle Duncan's March 2023 talk—and who screamed at Judge Duncan things like, "We hope your daughters get raped! [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
The Stanford Center for Internet and Society published a blog in response to the FCC’s announcement that it will vote to restore the net neutrality rules that were removed in 2017 in an agency meeting this April. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Congratulations to Bethany Berger upon her receipt of the Perry Zirkel ’76 Distinguished Teaching Award at UConn Law (UConn Today).Christine Lamberson, Director, Federal Judicial History Office, has a post on Chy Lung v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 5:19 am
Jayanta Bhattacharya (Stanford University) and Martin Kulldorff (Harvard University). [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
(part 2) The last post in this series[1] addressed how copyright law may impact the development and commercialization of Artificial Intelligence ("AI") tools, given their development relies on use of other people's creative works, often without notice or consent. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
Another canard Stanford dispels relates to supposed statements by Renee DiResta, research manager at Stanford University (and a board member of Tech Policy Press). [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am
People often assume that on-site work can lead to more innovation since it allows for more serendipitous meetings among colleagues. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:00 pm
” For the brief: https://www.eff.org/document/nevada-v-meta-amicus-brief Contact: AndrewCrockerSurveillance Litigation Directorandrew@eff.org [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:37 am
Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 4:17 pm
In Kejriwal v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm
But at least listen when I say this: There are lots of people, and even lots of law students, outside the bubble. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am
And don’t get me started on the Reasonably Scared Cop Rule of Graham v. [read post]
